Wednesday, August 01, 2007


the people versus remy lebeau (aka gambit)
posted @ 13:33 by ryan in [ General... ]

there are a good many people out there who enjoy comics. any argument you make about any one aspect can be vehemently argued by a member of the opposing camp.

given this, I would like to have a friendly and intelligent discussion on the merits of the character Gambit. by intelligent, I mean thought out and articulated rebuttals - i.e. no "Gambit is gay because he has boobs", but on the merits of references from canon and structured argument.

... ... ...

I submit that gambit is a very deep character, but like all comic book characters, developed into a more complex and interesteing character as his story, amidst other stories, progressed. From my research [1] I have ascertained that people

1) love gambit
2) hate gambit
3) don't care either way

For those that are of the first group, much more support[2] can be found than that of the second group. For those of the third group, obviously if you don't care, you are going to say anything because why waste your time on something about which you have no interest. I have also found that those of the second group are not nearly as vocal as the first, or as anti-[character] fans can be (see: Jar-Jar Binks, Joel Schumaker's Batman movies) But again, people are less like to rant about characters they don't like.

character complexity: I believe that character complexity leads either to an attractive mysteriousness or to an annoying hassle. As far as character complexities go, gambit is not nearly as complex as wolverine - but this can be attributed to the fact that writers kept diversifying wolverine's past and eventually clean it up with the whole weapon x (or 10, however you want to see it) storyline. Gambit is adopted, he is a thief, he is a mutant...

----------------------------------
[1] three or four google searches
[2] number of sites dedicated to

incomplete thought...



Wednesday, August 01, 2007


why I need to go to confession...
posted @ 13:31 by ryan in [ General... ]

Taken from http://ic.net/%7Eerasmus/RAZ278.HTM
::: ::: :::
Mortal vs.Venial Sin
1 John 5:17 explicitly differentiates a mortal sin from a less serious one (RSV):

All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin which is not mortal.
{KJV: "not unto death"}

Denying this would be tantamount to saying that a white lie or a momentary pang of jealousy or lust (especially if unrepented of) is the moral equivalent in God's eyes of a torture, rape, and murder? That's what the Protestant position -- starkly put -- reduces to.
Everyone agrees that all sin is barred from heaven, but again, that is future for us, not present, and this is precisely why purgatory is such a merciful, necessary doctrine. If God gets "serious" about actual, real sin in heaven, why in the world would He not start now? Catholics think that God -- in practical terms -- takes sin as seriously now as He will then, and that's one reason why we think mere imputation or forensic declaration of holiness is a falsehood.

1 John 5:16-17 expressly contradicts Protestant teaching on this. John says he shall give him life for them that sin not unto death, but Protestants say "all sin leads to spiritual death," and that all sins are equal in God's eyes. Who am I to believe? Again, the Apostle John says, there is a sin not unto death in 5:17. Thus he is clearly making the distinctions we make with regard to degrees of sin. Furthermore, it is not by any means certain from context that the "mortal sin" is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit alone. Some translations even have "there is sin," rather than "there is a sin."

Lastly, there are several lists of sins that are said to bar one from "the kingdom of heaven" (RSV):

1 Corinthians 6:9-10: "Unrighteous," immoral, idolaters, adulterers, sexual perverts, thieves, greedy, drunkards, revilers, robbers "will not inherit the kingdom of God."

Galatians 5:19-21: fornication, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, anger, selfishness, dissension, party spirit, envy, drunkenness, carousing, and the like . . . "those who do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God."

Ephesians 5:5: ". . . no fornicator or impure man, or one who is covetous (that is, an idolater), has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God."
::: ::: :::

bottom line...

I'm screwed.

::: ::: :::

O my God, I am heartily sorry for having offended Thee, and I detest all my sins, because I dread the loss of heaven, and the pains of hell; but most of all because they offend Thee, my God, Who are all good and deserving of all my love. I firmly resolve, with the help of Thy grace, to confess my sins, to do penance, and to amend my life.



Sunday, July 08, 2007


chocolate is chocoate... but not really.
posted @ 13:28 by ryan in [ General... ]

it's like saying all vodkas taste the same.

are you psycho?!

as with everything, you have your connoisseurs and your aficionados and your sommeliers...

so where am I in these standing?

chocolate: I'm a whore - I'll eat anything chocolate... I rarely come across chocolate that I don't like. not a big fan of ridiculously sweet chocolate or chocolate that is bitter or brittle and turns into crumbs when you bite into it...

vodka: nothing less than absolut, because that's as low as I'm willing to go if I have to pay - if it's free and crap, it's getting mixed with something, preferably red bull - which means I'm getting wasted. if it's the higher end stuff - grey goose, ketel one, vox, stolichnaya elit, belvedere...
Read more.



Monday, November 06, 2006


let me ride...
posted @ 16:22 by ryan in [ General... ]

hell yeah.

so hopefully it doesn't snow before I get home this week because rob just gave me a riding mower.

sweet.

because my lawn probably needs to be cut (even though it probably stopped growing for the year) and there are a ridiculous number of leaves just chillin on my lawn.

gotta get a bagger for it.

that's it for now.

I'm busy at work today because I actually have the access I need to do my work.

is it weird that I'm a little excited to get back to work?

yeah. it's weird.



Thursday, September 14, 2006



posted @ 21:16 by lorie in [ General... ]

Woo Hoo!!! We Won!!! *sigh of relief



Thursday, July 20, 2006


Ethan finally arrived
posted @ 19:28 by lorie in [ General... ]

He's here....finally. 7/20/06 at 7:24 PM weighing 7 lbs. 8 oz. and is 20.5 inches long. I can't wait to meet him!! Someone please post pictures!!



Wednesday, July 12, 2006


crack me up...
posted @ 01:38 by ryan in [ General... ]

Louis Tully: Your Honor, ladies and gentleman of the... of the audience, I don't think it's fair to call my clients frauds.

Sure, the blackout was a big problem for everybody. I was trapped in an elevator for two hours and I had to make the whole time.

But I don't blame them...

Because one time, I turned into a dog and they helped me.

Thank you.

Egon: Very good Louis. Short, but pointless.



Tuesday, May 23, 2006


luscious...
posted @ 01:02 by ryan in [ General... ]

meaning I'm a lush.

dude. seriously. I am not an alcoholic. I might talk about drinking a lot, but I think that it is because that is almost part of work. no, really. the work culture promotes drinking. not so much because we drink to forget, but because I think the people I work with can't loosen up without it. it would be nice if we could loosen up without the drink because I think we would be saving a lot of livers. I honestly think though that some people couldn't possibly let other people in without it... really, because some people are sooooo guarded...

I am hearing something dinging right now. I think it might be the chair.

yeah its the chair.

I am not going to post this right now because I think that i will wait, because I am actually drunk right now.

I will go to sleep and think about posting this at a later date.

it will just appear.

peace.

I'm out.



Wednesday, January 04, 2006


if I were a rich man...
posted @ 16:34 by ryan in [ General... ]

I would no longer be considered weird.

I would be eccentric.

dididididumdum dididididididididididididididi...



Tuesday, December 27, 2005


video games and movies...
posted @ 22:15 by ryan in [ General... ]

it has been my experience that most video games that are turned into movies suck big balls.

house of the dead [this is possibly the worst movie ever], street fighter [yeech], wing commander [like a lava lamp], mortal kombat [fun, but not much for replay]...

doom... [have yet to see it]

alone in the dark... [never saw it]

tomb raider... [eh...]

resident evil... [I like this one a lot]

and now... silent hill

dude.

that game messed me up a bunch, and I wasn't even the one playing it.

so the trailer looks very intriguing.

I'll be looking out for it.

I just thought i'd tell you. because I haven't blogged, I haven't updated the poker league and I really need to send out an e-mail.

k.

that's it.

bye.